After reading the article titled Revit
Parameters Part 1 – Concepts, I familiarized myself further on the advantages
of parameters and families within Revit. Parameters represent the “I” in BIM,
for it has the ability of storing information that can be scheduled, exported or
viewed as properties of an object (height of a door, width of a wall, etc.).
Parameters are simply placeholders for data, so they should be appropriately
named. Families in Revit include parameters as well, making the generation of
different schedules significantly more efficient when compared to traditional
CAD software.
Revit’s use of parameter types, both Instance
and Type, removes the need to frequently check schedules because of its
exceptional coordination. From viewing the Instance parameter of a door within
its properties, several values and a mark are unique to that door and that door
alone; since each door is automatically assigned a mark on the initial creation
of a schedule, Revit allows the user to alter the mark, but will not allow
duplicate marks. This is advantageous because it creates an easier layout to
follow due to custom (or even utilizing the default) marks. On the other hand, Type
parameters are the same for all (in this case) door types.
Revit also has immense Project and
Shared parameter capabilities. Project parameters may only be used on a current
Revit model or project, but Shared parameters may be stored in a file and can
be exploited by many users on many different projects. Although this
description entails Shared parameters to be more useful and dynamic, Project
parameters are both easier to use and are more efficient for tasks like creating
zones for various rooms and generating zone schedules; Project parameters also
require far less upkeep and maintenance. Both Project and Shared parameters provide
their own sets of advantages, consisting of versatile and robust means to
standardize stored data regarding all Revit instances or families.
Comments to Others:
Michael Sciarra
Michael, you raise a valid concern
regarding the conversion from 2D modeling to 3D modeling; for any new and
innovative technologies there will be a steep learning curve to get a handle on
the new software, but that is apparent with the release of any new technology,
and is often an expectation when making upgrades to systems. I do see the
concern on machines being able to handle new software, but with the current
state of hardware components, the majority of "base-line" machines,
especially within existing firms and not regarding casual users, can now run
high demanding programs due to the power of the technology we can now
fabricate, so I would not see this as a primary concern.
Michael Manley
Michael, I could not agree more with
the notion that Virtual Reality is going to be the next big implementation of
BIM products. The functionality and versatility it could provide in the design
and presentation of projects is exciting to think about. With technologies like
“Virtual Tours” already being used, adding Virtual Reality to the mix creates
even further immersion into various projects. I also enjoyed your discussion on
the potential of selling buildings with this feature; utilizing something like
Virtual Reality could sway a client into loving a project more than if just a
simulation is presented on the computer.
Madeleine Walker-Elders
Madeleine, after completing Assignment
One I experienced 3D building modeling for the first time, and it was advantageous
compared to regular 2D modeling; utilizing various views aided me in seeing
where I was heading with my project. I enjoyed how you incorporated an
environmental factor into its benefits, saving paper on sites and progressing
on completely digitizing documentation and data. Although digitizing all necessary
documentation seems like a flawless solution, something to account for with
this is the technology required to access this data as Dr. Fiori had also
mentioned, for if there is an issue with the technology various issues may
arise with viewing the needed data.
1 comment:
Hey Liam,
I enjoyed reading your post because one of the things I always found super interesting about Revit was its use of parameters and how the software organizes them. They allow for a lot of control in different ways between changing something that is an instance parameter versus something that is a type parameter. And getting a better understanding between the two has helped me immensely in my work flow.
Post a Comment