BIM is not just for modeling the final
product. It is useful for determining how
a building will be constructed, and can help identify constructability issues.
Contractors that use BIM generally save time and money. Regardless of what
phase of design the contractor gets in on, BIM will help them. However, the earlier
the better.
I am not very familiar with BIM. I know
REVIT is becoming more and more popular. I am also not very familiar with
contracting. I am only just beginning to understand engineering and
construction. I know part of the structural engineer’s job is to determine the
quantities of hardware needed for a specific job. If the building is modeled in
REVIT, the model will actually keep track of quantities and produce the
schedule. This lowers the risk of ordering the incorrect number of supplies.
Plus, this helps create a more accurate cost estimate.
BIM allows for massive amounts of
collaboration up front, known as integrated design. Instead of the architect
passing plans to the structural engineer, then the structural engineer passing
the plans on for MEP design, the process is integrated from the start. This
helps produce a higher quality building, and an efficient one. Contractors who
are involved from the start provide valuable input, as ultimately, they’re the
ones constructing the buildings. This helps increase coordination among the
contractors and whoever they might need to subcontract.
All the information provided with
traditional plans can be provided through a model. Sometimes details can be
hard to read. A model will show the component connectivity, and can be easily
shown from various perspectives. The model can show different layers, such as
HVAC, structural, or MEP.
I frequently hear that REVIT is the new
industry standard, and that AutoCAD is being phased out. However, I don’t know
any firms that have done away with AutoCAD. That’s what I used on both my
co-ops. Since I’m structural, maybe we don’t have as much of a use for REVIT
like MEP firms do. Or, maybe people are hoping that by saying REVIT is the new
standard, one day it will be true. Ultimately, I can see the merit in BIM, and
I do hope that it becomes the new industry standard. It leaves a lot less room
for error.
Reference: Eastman, Chuck,
et al. BIM Handbook : A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners,
Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, John Wiley &
Sons, Incorporated, 2018. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy2.library.drexel.edu/lib/drexel-ebooks/detail.action?docID=5447327.
Spencer,
Since I am unfamiliar with BIM, I didn't
realize firm-wide object libraries were a thing. On my second co-op, the
majority of my job was AutoCAD drafting. Having access to firm-wide
standardized objects would've significantly decreased my drafting time, giving
me more time for other things. We definitely had some shared objects, like span
arrows, but those still had to be brought in from other drawings. A firm-wide
library makes a lot of sense.
Mika,
It's interesting how we create more
problems by solving older ones. BIM has progressed the industry, but created
new problems, such as data loss. I've personally experienced a lot of issues
with different model versions being opened on different software versions. My
second co-op had a separate remote computer for people to use, instead of
updating everyone's software. Our firm had a lot of technical issues, and
people frequently lost data. We had our entire server backed up constantly so
data could be restored. The large files frequently caused my AutoCAD to force
quit. Hopefully technology keeps improving to solve these issues.
Amanda,
I didn't realize that 92% of operation
cost is spend on the users of a building. It makes a lot of sense to use BIM to
make a building more efficient. BIM is probably helpful in showing how a larger
upfront cost lowers operational costs and produces a greener/more sustainable
building. Integrated design is definitely the way to go, and BIM will help make
it the industry standard.
1 comment:
I also read pieces regarding contractors and BIM, I can clearly see the benefits that come along with software and their work. I am curious if building the software to a point in which a profession like contracting could function completely off it would be a viable option in the future.
Post a Comment